tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post115979923307162768..comments2023-06-28T16:58:41.189+02:00Comments on Web Reflection: google world, world wide or world wide web ?Andrea Giammarchihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-7005321482324580502007-04-14T23:12:00.000+02:002007-04-14T23:12:00.000+02:00Hey! I've come up with this issue a "little bit" l...Hey! I've come up with this issue a "little bit" later than you :).<BR/>I didn't get those tech details in your post...would you be so kind to check <A HREF="http://www.bianchimarco.com/2007/04/14/wgoogleit/" REL="nofollow">this<BR/></A> out?<BR/>ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159909360363946412006-10-03T23:02:00.000+02:002006-10-03T23:02:00.000+02:00yes, it's just a subdomain ... but I didn't search...yes, it's just a subdomain ... but I didn't search on w.google.it before, then as i've said, it was a funny thing for me.<BR/><BR/>however, if I try to add a single char subdomain in my spaces it's not possible.<BR/><BR/><I>Il nome digitato per lo spazio web non รจ valido</I><BR/>that means:<BR/><B>digited name is not valid for a web space</B><BR/><BR/>then I wonder how many spaces enables single sub-domain names and how many URL regexp works with a single name as first accepted characters.<BR/><BR/>Last thing, how many google, in the world, works with single subdomain name instead of a redirect to original and correct url ?<BR/><BR/>Did I say this is a funny post ? ...Andrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159908676808342082006-10-03T22:51:00.000+02:002006-10-03T22:51:00.000+02:00Dude are you serious?!That's just are subdomains!Y...Dude are you serious?!<BR/>That's just are subdomains!<BR/><BR/>You can have anything like WKIWWHHWHWHW.site.com if you like.<BR/><BR/>Google world. huh.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159856032157565902006-10-03T08:13:00.001+02:002006-10-03T08:13:00.001+02:00P.S. why did you talk about MemTronic on this post...P.S. why did you talk about MemTronic on this post ? :PAndrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159855999296760602006-10-03T08:13:00.000+02:002006-10-03T08:13:00.000+02:00Hello Mario :-)Did you read this on MemTronic site...Hello <B>Mario</B> :-)<BR/><BR/>Did you read this on MemTronic site ?<BR/><BR/>It's about v1.0 [Jul-2006]:<BR/><I>DeCompression-Routine rewritten from scratch so that users with other than ISO-8859-1 charsets<BR/> no longer should encounter any problems when using their language specific charsets!</I><BR/><BR/>Then I don't know if I need to add charsetAndrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159819730976467432006-10-02T22:08:00.000+02:002006-10-02T22:08:00.000+02:00Don't get me wrong I am not saying your code is fl...Don't get me wrong I am not saying your code is flawed. I think you have done a great job. Just saying Memtronic's cruncher has issues with certain advanced regular expressions, where as Dean's packer does not.. its not just a matter of having proper semi colons. So your code could be technically correct and packer friendly and memtronics cruncher will choke on it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159819174099812992006-10-02T21:59:00.000+02:002006-10-02T21:59:00.000+02:00If you add the charset="iso-8859-1" to the script ...<I>If you add the charset="iso-8859-1" to the script tag it fixes that problem.</I><BR/>Thank you Mario for this news, I didn't know Memtronic and that's why there's a Dean Edwards packer version too on download area.<BR/><BR/>However, bytefx is wrote to be compatible with Dean's packer and MemTronic seems to work correctly with same settings then I need some test to be sure that mtronic version needs charset iso.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><I>Also be aware that memtronics has issues "crunching" some code</I><BR/>thank you again but as I've said, I just write javascript in a packer compatible way and Memtronic version seems to be stable as Open Source version is (or better, should be :D)Andrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159808944713424682006-10-02T19:09:00.000+02:002006-10-02T19:09:00.000+02:00Mario again,Also be aware that memtronics has issu...Mario again,<BR/><BR/>Also be aware that memtronics has issues "crunching" some code (which it performs automatically before any compression). To solve this I use Dean Edwards packer set to "no compression" which will correctly crunch the code. Then copy n past the crunched code from Packer to Memtronics and it will work. I have successfully compressed scriptaculous (35.5kb full all scripts included in 1 file, much smaller when doing just peaces), prototype 1.4 (13kb), 1.5rc0 (16.9),1.5rc1(19kb) and prototipify.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159808652174537312006-10-02T19:04:00.000+02:002006-10-02T19:04:00.000+02:00This is Mario from the Ajaxian forums... You need ...This is Mario from the Ajaxian forums... You need to include a charset="iso-8859-1" attrib in your script tags with anything compressed with memtronics. I noticed after compressing scriptaculous that the scripts didnt work becuase they had a meta tag on their page that set the charset to "utf-8". If you add the charset="iso-8859-1" to the script tag it fixes that problem.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159802121138146682006-10-02T17:15:00.000+02:002006-10-02T17:15:00.000+02:00any redirect for google.it ... google.com does red...any redirect for google.it ... google.com does redirect, yahoodoes redirect ... other sites (www.blogger.com too) doesn't do any redirect, if you write a wrong url ... you'll see an error.<BR/><BR/>In google.it you can use w.google.it and do everything, any redirect, you'll use w.google.it ... while google.com does a redirect :DAndrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-1159801747011831602006-10-02T17:09:00.000+02:002006-10-02T17:09:00.000+02:00funny, seems that yahoo have a similar things, if ...funny, seems that yahoo have a similar things, if you digit w or ww it<BR/>redirect to yahoo search <BR/>I think is the same behaviour, only that google is not a portal but merely a search engine (so google search and google are the same)kentaromiurahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01628828429767241919noreply@blogger.com