tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post8139630978293862776..comments2023-06-28T16:58:41.189+02:00Comments on Web Reflection: JavaScript arguments Weirdness!Andrea Giammarchihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-26603213429522114572009-06-21T23:55:42.208+02:002009-06-21T23:55:42.208+02:00Juryi, as you know I am against arguments.callee d...Juryi, as you know I am against arguments.callee decision for ECMAScript.Next but I am sure -2 and -3 are for internal purpose only, exposed only if manually called (for this reason slower to "discover"). Accordingly, the day arguments.callee will disappear it does not make sense to retrieve it via -3 if the all goal is to get rid of it so I think it will not be usable while -2 for the lenght will be still there.Andrea Giammarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16277820774810688474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34454975.post-11487708944654661672009-06-21T23:14:03.600+02:002009-06-21T23:14:03.600+02:00I wonder if it would be possible to access `argume...I wonder if it would be possible to access `arguments.callee` via `arguments[-3]` when in ES5-strict. <br /><br />If so, it is probably a security hole which will need to be taken care of.kangaxhttp://thinkweb2.com/projects/prototype/noreply@blogger.com