Being these unsupported browsers compatible with both native Array.prototype.indexOf and __defineGetter__ and being 5 to 100 times faster than IE, I thought: why don't put this as well into vice-versa?
/** sourceIndex by vice-versa - Mit Style License
* @target FireFox, Safari, Chrome
*/
if(typeof document.documentElement.sourceIndex == "undefined")
HTMLElement.prototype.__defineGetter__("sourceIndex", (function(indexOf){
return function sourceIndex(){
return indexOf.call(this.ownerDocument.getElementsByTagName("*"), this);
};
})(Array.prototype.indexOf));
;
I so much would have cached the live getElementsByTagName("*") object then I thought there must be a reason if different libraries pass via node.ownerDocument rather than direct document ... isn't it? Well, if not I'll change soon but right now I am pretty much happy with performances :)
Why sourceIndex
If we would like to know, as example, if a node is before or after another one (considering that nested nodes will be considered always after their container) I bet there's nothing simpler than:
if(a.sourceIndex < b.sourceIndex){
// move up b, move down a
} else {
// move up a, move down b
}
... or something similar, enjoy
Update
Apparently in jQuery dev list somebody already talked about analogue snippets (thanks @diegoperini) but it's not my idea to normalize anything, respecting what sourceIndex should do: compare index in the full HTMLCollection and nothing else, the rest could be easily implemented over this snippet :)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.